سایت شخصی احمد علینقی

Like all dictators, Putin has two tools: "lie & trick." With these two he deceives the people & rules .
A revolutionary armed fighter under any ideology, like a terrorist, only destroys. The essence of revolutionary thinking is elimination and the essence of the weapon of destruction .
آنچه در ایران وجود ندارد ساختار فهم مدیریت و فرهنگ مدیریت است. اما حاکمیت مدام مدیر عوض میکند. وضعیت نابسامان امروزین ناشی از همین خطاست .
هرچند «سکولاریسم» تاریخچه ای طولانی ندارد. ولی کوروش کبیر نخستین امپراتور بود که با نگرش سکولاریسم بر نیمی از دنیا حکمرانی کرد *
شالوده زندگی بشریت امید به آینده بهتر است. آیا در ایران من می توان امیدی به آینده بهتر داشت!؟ .
دوران قانون گرایی صده 20 گذشت. قرن 21 عصر نمایش مدیریت اجتماعی برای برخورداری از یک جامعه نیکبخت است .
آنچه سبب برخاستن غرب از خاک قرون وسطی گردید، مبارزات اجتماعی نبود. بلکه این روشنگری اجتماعی بود که تکانه حرکت بزرگ شد .
Freedom is the breath space of human psyche. If this space is closed, then, of course, a person will be depressed. .
آزادی فضای نفس کشیدن روان انسانهاست. اگر این فضا بسته شود، بیگمان روان آدمی افسرده می گردد. .
برعکس آدمهای نفهم که فقط زور بازو دارند. ولی انسانهای فهیم غیر از زور بازو، عقل هم دارند .
کپی نویسی در پژوهشهای نظری و مهندسی معکوس در تحقیقات صنعتی، دو عارضه بنیادی در نظام پژوهشی ایران .
فضای جنگی در کشور، برایند نبود توانش های لازم برای مدیریت اصولی کشور است .
ویل دورانت: مردمی که در جهل و خرافات دست و پا میزنند، آمادگی پذیرش دموکراسی را ندارند .
Effective social management is surely recognition of human needs, requirements of society and balanced these two important elements .
The present day is the "era of management," and countries need more efficient and productive managers than anything else .
همانطور که جامعه کولاژی از آدمهای مختلف می باشد، پس باید کولاژ عقیدتی و باورها را نیز پذیرا باشیم .
آیا منافع ملی در هر کشور، غیر از تامین آسایش و آرامش همگانی و رفاه عمومی می باشد؟ .
The advancement of societies is precisely at the level of their social management .
The status of each nation in history is precisely according to its own will .
Information awareness is not very important. But what is important, is knowledge of social interpretation .

Maduro believes that his leadership is preferable to his people and his country

If in the earlier days, governments and social rulers were counted, and rulers by the closure of the community, called the despotism, had every effort to maintain their sovereignty through the use of all means and tools. But in the contemporary era, the sovereignty and political regime has changed, and countries are not entirely dependent on a government style and a particular individual. If, during the old days, the king or ruler was the center of society, and staying was the first principle. Today, however, the times have changed and are the focus on the people. Accordingly, the sovereignty program is floating in countries, and no ruler maintains legitimacy with any circumstances. Indeed, in contemporary time, the rulers represent people and, as long as they work for the general good and advance the society towards progress, they reign under conditions of re-election of the people. And whenever it comes to defeating people and the society suffers disorder and irregularities, it is undoubtedly time to rule and come to the next ruler. That is the meaning of floating rule. The basis and principle of this kind of government is the satisfaction of the people and the course of the excellence of society. Now, if the ruler of the power of these two principles is incapable of satisfying the public and of the development of the society and removing society from his natural course, he must certainly leave room for another kind of sovereignty and another person. Now, if a ruler can’t provide these two essential principles for providing public satisfaction and the development of society and removing society from its natural course, one must definitely leave room for another kind of sovereignty and another person.

Venezuela is now in a deadlock that there is no way to unlock the community. For many years, due to Chávez's and Maduro's socialist policies, Venezuela has been struggling with many problems, and each year it's getting worse. But Maduro, the Venezuelan President-in-Office, has steadily introduced foreigners (and especially the United States) as a source of disturbance, and remains powerless with the military. Today Venezuela does not have any natural course. Inflation and expensive crippled the people, and due to the depreciation of the national currency, the purchasing power of the people is very weak and the poor price has pulled people into poverty. However, according to experts, Venezuela has the world's largest oil reserves. The country has a growing potential for development and the people of this country must live in peace and prosperity. But because of the imagined and militaristic policies that it wants to enforce this kind of discourse by socialist ideology and void plans, Venezuela's society is misplaced. He thinks anti-hostile behavior with the United States, separation from the international community, and oppressive politics with economic austerity, are useful for the Venezuelan community. But it can be seen that this ideological discourse does not have the ability to save and steer socially at the present time and in today's conditions, because otherwise it should definitely be answered in these two decades. So what is all this insistence on creating a bottleneck for people?! Will the pressure and threat of the people answer?! No doubt. He expects people to remain under great pressure and poverty, until he remains alive with his demands for a policy of fighting America. That is, his pleasure makes people unhappy.

Unfortunately, the word dictator is in the present time heart and the dictator is depicted to a vampire person. However, it should be noted that any ruler who closes the society based on his own vision and desire and removes the people from actual participation in matters and restricts people is precisely the case of a dictator. Because the dictator is a person who dictates his comments in the society and the environment, so then, is not Madaraur a dictator's ruler?! Today, he closes the community, poverty and misery all over the Venezuelan society, the military is involved in all matters, the economy is completely bankrupt, and Madaro and his government are unable to solve the problems of the emptiness. But Madara believes in absolute self-esteem and does not accept any solution other than his own government. He strongly oppresses the society and, by providing countless troops, heavily suppresses any kind of popular protest movement. Should not you call him a dictator?! Is he right to put the Venezuelan community and the people of Venezuela at risk of thinking about the war with America and preventing the influence of the United States and unfortunately, endangering Venezuela's wealthy land

02/24/2019

کلمات کلیدی: Maduro;despotism; Venezuela; dictator